"Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than
bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality of those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change."
- Robert F. Kennedy
Have Something to Say?
We encourage citizens to be involved in their government. If you have an issue that you would like to be publicized here, please submit your articles for consideration to:
woodstocktruth@charter.net
Truth Has Its Rewards!
Monthly beginning in April, we will select a submitted article for recognition and the author will receive the coveted 'Truth' coffee mug pictured
below...Good luck!
Do we really need another blog in a small town like Woodstock? Absolutely. If you have read the initial entry you know exactly why.
As you may have noticed, comments are no longer open on any of the posted articles. Debating the anonymous lunatic fringe is not the point of such a publication in my opinion and is a huge waste of
time. So instead, I have linked the blog to my Facebook page where all of the blog entries are also posted and the debate has moved there. There are no restrictions on access to my Facebook page as I
have nothing to hide. However, as I have always encouraged people to make comments they are proud of, believe in and are able to stand behind, in order to post you will have to have a Facebook
account. So far this has negated the need to police unprovoked personal attacks and the like.
As always, if you have something to say that you aren't willing to make public, you have the option to drop me a line at woodstocktruth@charter.net and you will get a response if your comment
deserves one.
In order to access my Facebook page simply click the badge below. Thanks.
1/3/2009 12:52 PM
Maggie wrote:
Woodstock Cafe only prints what they want people to believe and not the truth...They protect the people who believe in their personal politics when you expose fraud you are banished from the freedom to answer and defend accusation made by Breen and his alter egos (IE) pen names...This is my opinion and that of my friends who have been there and tried to defend the truth. Reader beware!
1/3/2009 4:54 PM
Maggie wrote:
I spoke to soon after reading some recent entries. I have noticed they are being better about printing both sides of the commentary. They do however draw from a certain category of the undesirable population (ie) Breen.
1/7/2009 12:21 PM
JC wrote:
Please CLARIFY and explain who and what you mean by the phrase "certain category of the undesirable population"? Who are they and what, specifically, make them undesirable? Do they not deserve their say? Or do you mean they dominate, thus not giving enough space for others? Truly, just looking for an objective description - 'undesirable populations' just sounds so bad, I can't help but ask for explanation. Thanks
1/7/2009 1:13 PM
Maggie wrote:
JC, Sorry I mean they dominate, thus not giving enough space for others.
When one man with one view uses several names to gang up on others and will not accept any other views, then resorts to calling people names and pointing fingers at other people...he then goes to the extreme by accusing you of being a member of a faction, socializing with people of similar opinion as others. He has even gone as far as ordering you off the blog and restricts you to using other blog's to express your point of view.
He uses phrases such as "dark forces in Woodstock" and “go back where you came from” nonsense. Who the hell does he think he is?
Also this- "I do not understand why you are not writing your complaints to the CPS/Truth/Coalition who have for three decades continually disrupted the “harmony” of Woodstock with their false, malicious allegations about the Woodstock public schools. You seem to believe their actions are somehow in harmony with Woodstock and mine are not." "Snuffy" (Joe Breen)
Not just to me but others with the same point of view. Maybe they should add to the blog "FOR MEMBERS ONLY". I thought it was open to the public ??????
Editor's note:JC, Maggie is describing what goes on at the Woodstock Cafe website- AKA the "Aljazerra Cafe", all of which is well described throughout this blog and documented with facts.
1/5/2009 12:08 PM
Admin wrote:
I think the larger issue is that there are never any facts (documents/video) presented- just dogmatic opinions.
January 8th, 2009 at 4:17 pm My mom and Dad can not afford to pay the bills. Stop trying to jack up taxes and leave us alone, you make my mom cry.
Cafe’ers, Don’t swallow this. Admin
Admin says:
January 8th, 2009 at 8:03 pm Molly is a fraud. We don’t let people use children as part of our conversation. And people should not invent children to bolster their conversation. We have created a new file on the bottom left sidebar. The next mis-step by this individual will lead to banishment of all comments to the Siberian file.
Maggie says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
January 9th, 2009 at 8:27 am Because a grandchild decides to use there Grandmothers computer and express a thought or comment is hardly a act of fraud. Mr. Breen however uses several names and violated your policies every day and you consider that OK, a great example of partisanship. Guess your expressed desire is to print just what you want people to hear and not the truth…CC: Truth
Maggie says:
January 9th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Welcome to Siberia. Admin
1/9/2009 2:33 PM
Maggie wrote:
When Communists came to power, most of Siberian prisoners were political prisoners who were accused of treason, espionage, sabotage, or anti-Soviet propaganda. Ninety nine percent of them were innocent.
Thinking of using WoodstockCafe? Caveat emptor in this case user beware. The only print what they want people to read, The experience I had was name calling , accusation , degrading until they could justify a way of insuring silence. Confidentiality in the administration is reserved for Breen and his many aliases.
Woodstock Cafe only prints what they want people to believe and not the truth...They protect the people who believe in their personal politics when you expose fraud you are banished from the freedom to answer and defend accusation made by Breen and his alter egos (IE) pen names...This is my opinion and that of my friends who have been there and tried to defend the truth. Reader beware!
I spoke to soon after reading some recent entries. I have noticed they are being better about printing both sides of the commentary. They do however draw from a certain category of the undesirable population (ie) Breen.
Please CLARIFY and explain who and what you mean by the phrase "certain category of the undesirable population"? Who are they and what, specifically, make them undesirable? Do they not deserve their say? Or do you mean they dominate, thus not giving enough space for others? Truly, just looking for an objective description - 'undesirable populations' just sounds so bad, I can't help but ask for explanation. Thanks
JC, Sorry I mean they dominate, thus not giving enough space for others.
When one man with one view uses several names to gang up on others and will not accept any other views, then resorts to calling people names and pointing fingers at other people...he then goes to the extreme by accusing you of being a member of a faction, socializing with people of similar opinion as others. He has even gone as far as ordering you off the blog and restricts you to using other blog's to express your point of view.
He uses phrases such as "dark forces in Woodstock" and “go back where you came from” nonsense. Who the hell does he think he is?
Also this- "I do not understand why you are not writing your complaints to the CPS/Truth/Coalition who have for three decades continually disrupted the “harmony” of Woodstock with their false, malicious allegations about the Woodstock public schools. You seem to believe their actions are somehow in harmony with Woodstock and mine are not." "Snuffy" (Joe Breen)
Not just to me but others with the same point of view. Maybe they should add to the blog "FOR MEMBERS ONLY". I thought it was open to the public ??????
Editor's note: JC, Maggie is describing what goes on at the Woodstock Cafe website- AKA the "Aljazerra Cafe", all of which is well described throughout this blog and documented with facts.
I think the larger issue is that there are never any facts (documents/video) presented- just dogmatic opinions.
Examples of "Aljazerra Cafe",
Molly says:
January 8th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
My mom and Dad can not afford to pay the bills. Stop trying to jack up taxes and leave us alone, you make my mom cry.
Cafe’ers, Don’t swallow this. Admin
Admin says:
January 8th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Molly is a fraud. We don’t let people use children as part of our conversation. And people should not invent children to bolster their conversation. We have created a new file on the bottom left sidebar. The next mis-step by this individual will lead to banishment of all comments to the Siberian file.
Maggie says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
January 9th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Because a grandchild decides to use there Grandmothers computer and express a thought or comment is hardly a act of fraud. Mr. Breen however uses several names and violated your policies every day and you consider that OK, a great example of partisanship. Guess your expressed desire is to print just what you want people to hear and not the truth…CC: Truth
Welcome to Siberia. Admin
When Communists came to power, most of Siberian prisoners were political prisoners who were accused of treason, espionage, sabotage, or anti-Soviet propaganda. Ninety nine percent of them were innocent.
Thinking of using WoodstockCafe? Caveat emptor in this case user beware. The only print what they want people to read, The experience I had was name calling , accusation , degrading until they could justify a way of insuring silence. Confidentiality in the administration is reserved for Breen and his many aliases.
...